"Austin Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > side by side and evaluate them. My largest print size is 17x22 from my > 3000. I can see differences from "standard viewing distances" that have > convinced me that 180+ is the minimum resolution that is acceptable to me > for the type of work I do, if not 240+ preferred. 100 is vastly degraded.
Hi Austin, Do you have another printer? The reason I ask is that the 3000 is very long in the tooth. I had a print from Lyson demonstrating their long life inks, and the dithering was pretty ugly compared to the Photo 700 I had at the time. I'm just wondering how the output from an 1160 or 1290 at 100dpi compares with the 3000, and yes I know you can't print as big. :) Rob
