On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:59:57 +1100 Julian Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Then somewhere downstream other sales people > mess it all up by not appreciating the niceties of what was agreed > elsewhere and plonk in the new figure with what they think is a > "synonymous" name. In the context of marketing, 'dynamic range' and 'density range' seem interchangeable - neither lets you know exactly what is meant or how they derived the impressive-sounding number. I rather think that's the intention:) Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Bob Shomler
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems with Canoscan FS2710 ... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Vuescan 6.4.8 problems with Canoscan FS2... Dean Brown
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly encoded Rick Trelles
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly encoded Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly encoded Rick Trelles
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly encoded Rick Trelles
- Re: filmscanners: 1:1024 range 8-bit linearly encoded Tony Sleep
