Paragraph is clear enough for me to understand. And is perfectly
correct to my judgement.
Slava
--- Austin Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > for
> > a given sensitivity from the analog circuitry, changing the
> > A/D won't make any difference to the density ranges
> > that the analog circuitry resolves. It only increases the
> > accuracy with which we read the range of analog values
> > that the CCD *does* resolve.
>
> May be I'm slow today...but that paragraph is really unclear to me,
> and I
> know this stuff quite well. What exactly do you mean by 'for a given
> sensitivity from the analog circuitry'? Sensitivity can describe
> one of
> many characteristics, so this seems ambiguous.
>
> Also, what do you mean by 'to the density ranges that the analog
> circuitry
> resolves'. The above paragraph seems to intermix (confuse) different
> concepts/terms, and really comes across, at least to me, as not very
> comprehdable. I don't think 'resolves' is the right word there.
>
> Also, 'analog values that the CCD *does* resolve'? Again, resolve
> doesn't
> really sound right here... The only thing in the described system
> that is
> 'resolved' is the A/D.
>
=====
--- NOTE: EMAIL HAS CHANGED !!! ---------------------
Slava Zilberfayn | Home +1(416)7838430 | Work +1(416)5931122x2486
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADDRESS: appt 1219, 377 Ridelle ave, M6B1K2, Toronto, ON, CANADA
_______________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca
