On 28/05/2025 15.04, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 7:00 PM Mark Filipak <markfilipak.i...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist? It is weak and clumsy.
The 'fieldmatch' filter followed by 'decimate' do a better job and are
robust.
By continuing to carry obsolete filters, FFmpeg emasculates itself. That
makes FFmpeg appear to be
chaotic and ties up names that could be, should be reused to better effect.
The same could be written about many FFmpeg filters. Dump them, or create
a "Legacy" category in the
documentation and put them there. Also, include documentation in "Legacy"
that shows how to replace
the obsolete filters in existing scripts. Promote the best filters, not
the worst.
You are extremely biased and unhelpful.
Paul, do you _ever_ use 'detelecine'?
What other filters you want to purge and why?
Shall we, together, begin a list?
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
