ср, 18 сент. 2024 г. в 08:01, Andrew Strachan <stroltz-at-hotmail....@ffmpeg.org>: > > Just to clarify, you suggest > > source(Decklink) >> ffmpeg>> local streaming server>> file recording, preview > and CDN > > So 1 just x instance of ffmpeg is best, and not using multiple outputs.
Correct. Input >> ffmpeg - split input to main and monitoring; - scale monitoring stream to lower resolution - encode both streams - provide both outputs to local streaming server ffmpeg >> local streaming server - use API to start and stop recordings (or web console, if you do it manually) - provide streams to CDN or/and provide access to your streams for end users recorded files >> another ffmpeg (controlled by some script that get RECORDING COMPLETED event to start ffmpeg process) - extract audio from recorded file - save audio into file Something like this. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
