On 11/13/23 04:04, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 4:33 AM <markfilipak.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are the target PTSs out of order?
Why are there no 0 or 1001 DTSs?
DTS is different from PTS.
Indeed: Decoder versus Presentation.
'-bsf:v setts' is before decoding, so there's both PTS & DTS, right?
'-vf setpts' is after decoding, so there's no '-vf setdts', right? And '-vf setpts' applies to the
pictures going to the encoder, right?
Is PTS > DTS? Or is PTS <= DTS? I've seen it both ways in professional DVDs.
What do you say, Paul?
And you should probably reorder DTS by keeping original order - just do
offset and not by using packet number.
Then, of what use is '-bsf:v setts=pts=xxxx:dts=xxxx'? Why do they exist?
I designed video hardware/chips at Atari in the early 1980s, so I know every detail of PAL & NTSC
and I designed state machine sequencers to generate the signals -- pretty easy, actually. The
engineers before me screwed the signals up and got Atari a bad name for a while.
Maybe I don't understand how 'bit stream filter' got its name. Everything is a bit stream, so I
don't really know to what 'stream' 'bsf' refers to. I've assumed that 'bsf' refers to the packet
stream prior to decoding. Is that right, Paul?
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
