Am 15.10.23 um 17:51 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 15.10.23 um 17:20 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
With "veryfast" I stated to "not care about *space*", but with "-crf 23" I always stated
"care about same quality".
you statet "i don't care about anything but speed"
you didn't state more or less
Correct, but more speed requires to accept more space for the same video
quality, in counterpart to
"for constant quality encoding, you will simply save bitrate by choosing a slower
preset".
..... which means "don't care about space".
is it really that hard to understand that depending on the input results differ
*dramatically*? when you have a video with nearly no motion compression works
far better
No problem to understand in case of different input, but in my case the input was
identical the same for the 3 outputs, so I expect to "save bitrate by choosing a
slower preset". This wasn't the case with the exactly identical input. I oppositely
had more bitrate with a slower preset.
it all depends on the input and what quality loss is acceptable
The quality loss was precisely stated by "-crf 23" for all 3 runs.
and "verfyfast" simply don't care much about details ...
... even if stating the level of details constantly by i.e. "-crf 23" ???
break the same down to zip: use it for a video or a html-file
guess what is more compressable
I guess we better would compare zip with i.e. xz. For the same quality (here
lossless) zip compresses faster than xz, but needs more space than xz.
-Ulf
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
