Am 06.08.22 um 20:11 schrieb jatmvp ctf:
I thought quality goes in pair with size
there *may be* some correlation *but* you have speed/quality/size to
assign and can only chose two as you can only have two of cheap/quick/good
you need a ton of cpu-usage to squeeze out the last bit of quality while
a sloppy and fast run leads to a way larger output file with terrible
quality
----------
take as example MP3 with VBR
it will have the same or even better quality with VBR than 320kbit -
extreme example: why would you need 320kbit for 2 seconds of silence?
or take a mono record - with joint-stereo and VBR it takes less than
half of the size of CBR with to difference - "play the same on both
channels" don't need the information twice
and before someone cries: yes, VBR with maximum settings can sound
better at complex parts where even 320kbit won't be enough because it's
more evenly around the complex part which needs high bitrates and what
your ear notices is un-evenly quality - headroom is the key - CBR don't
have any
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
