On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 8:14 AM Clayton Macleod <cherrytw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:26 PM CMG DiGiTaL <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > OK mark, very nice to hear about your audio experience!...I love it, it > > makes me feel free and alive! > > > > With this internet audio standardization movement, I'm paying more > > attention to this type of LUFS standardization > > because my commercial jingles have to be platform compliant. I'm also a > fan > > of compression and, as today everything > > has to be very fast, I'm creating a normalization batch so I don't have > to > > spend unnecessary money on something that > > I can try to do myself, testing a lot beforehand of course!...for this > > reason I'm trying to understand where the +7.2 Trim > > that the plugin finds in the test audio is applied, to try to make the > > batch as correct as possible. > > > > Claman, probably the best advice you could receive is some I've already > given. Which is, perhaps you should reexamine your choice of target > volume. If most or all of your source files require being turned up you > are better off using your volume knob on the amplifier. Seriously. There > is no better way to adjust the volume than that volume control on the > amplifier. That is its sole reason for existing. > > Perhaps you need a different tool. If you're actually just dealing with > music files you should snag foobar2000 and use it for this job instead. It > uses the same R128 algorithm. It is made for dealing with music, being a > music player. And you can load up your entire library and analyze it all > without having to adjust anything. You will be able to see all your > required adjustments in the UI before touching your file data. This will > let you see all the adjustment data at a glance, better allowing you to > determine what a good target value will be for your entire library. A good > target value will be one that ensures all your file data will have to be > turned down rather than up. For that matter, you can have the player make > the adjustments on the fly during playback so you don't even have to alter > your file data at all. ffmpeg really isn't the right tool for this job. > > I disagree with you. FFmpeg is right tool for this jobs. You just do not know how to use it. > -- > Clayton Macleod > If no one comes from the future to stop you from doing it, then how bad of > a decision can it really be? > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
