Cecil Westerhof via ffmpeg-user <ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org> writes: > Ferdi Scholten <fe...@sttc-nlp.nl> writes: > >> On 15-12-2021 18:18, Cecil Westerhof via ffmpeg-user wrote: >>> When looking at: >>> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.265 >>> >>> with h.265 the value 28 should correspond with the value 23 with >>> h.264. >>> Is there a (rough) table for the other values? >>> >> Well, no not really >> >> Those figures are generic. In reality there are many things that can >> affect both quality and size. >> The kind of video used as a source, the amount of visual detail, the >> preset used or other settings all have a big impact either on size or >> quality of the encode. >> >> So what is your goal, would you want high quality, small file sizes or >> fast encoding speed? All these things you need to trade off to get to >> your optimum encoding settings. Do some trial runs with small samples to >> find out what suits your needs. > > In a way all three. ;-) > > But my first impression it is not worth it. (After a very short test.) > It seems that h.265 generates a marginal smaller file, with a marginal > better quality, but takes two times as much computer power.
In another case h.265 took 2/3 longer, but the size was 3/5. So that could be interesting. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
