On 2021-04-07 22:33, Adrian Cable wrote:
Mark – yes – you’re understanding exactly right! I was thinking specifically of
the encoder ‘throttle’ being a frame rate control, but other forms of quality
control that could be self-adjusted by the encoder to keep up with the input
would also work for me.
I did look through the history here but couldn’t find anything quite
applicable. I do appreciate you taking the time to understand my issue!
Hopefully someone who has direct experience of how to achieve this will read
this as a result and be able to help.
Then you should restart this topic with a subject line that doesn't say "drop
frames".
This is dropping frames, and it's exactly what the 'fps' filter does.
[A] [B] [C] [D] [E] [F] [G] [H] [I] [J] ...input
[A] [B] [C] [D] [E] [F] [G] [I] [H] ...output CFR ([H] dropped)
This is repeating frames, and it's also exactly what the 'fps' filter does.
[A] [B] [C] [D] [E] [F] [G] [H] [I] ...input
[A] [B] [C] [D] [D] [E] [F] [G] [H] ...output CFR ([D] repeated)
CFR: constant frame rate.
Of course, the pictures will judder when frames are either dropped or repeated.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
