On 2021-02-26 19:06, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 1:01 AM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) <markfili...@bog.us>
wrote:
On 2021-02-26 18:49, Paul B Mahol wrote:
This is math question, and does not belong here.
Yes, it's a math question. I'm questioning how ffmpeg is doing math.
By converting TB to periods with millisecond resolution, it limits
temporal resolution to 1 part in
1000 parts no matter what the time base is. Attempting to increase
resolution by shifting to a
higher time base changes the number of bit of PTS but has no affect on
resolution. And it's
resolution (or lack thereof) that causes the problems that ffmpeg clearly
has.
FFmpeg have no such problem you want to put it on.
Get troll and spread lies somewhere else.
What lies? What have I written that's not 100% true as shown by ffmpeg's own
outputs?
You are constantly being rude and try to badmouth ffmpeg on daily basis.
What rudeness? I have been courteous to you, always. What badmouthing? All I've done is point out
unnecessary loss of resolution that hasn't been disputed. Do you dispute it?
Also you never provide any useful logs, or inputs.
I provided the showinfo input and output to you. What more do you need?
Are you over your head here, Paul? Let's work on the time base problems together. I'm sure that
would make everyone happier, including you, and including me.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
