Am Mo., 26. Okt. 2020 um 06:44 Uhr schrieb Carl Zwanzig <[email protected]>: > > On 10/25/2020 10:14 PM, Juan carlos Rebate wrote: > > However if you compile two separate versions > > there would be no licensing issue if you share it, would it? > > If you "share" the build, then technically you're distributing it. The one > that's GPL only is perfectly fine to share (following the rules of the GPL, > please read them....), but if non-free parts are statically linked in, then > I don't think that one is distributable. > > The questions that drive "can I distribute" include- > Is this a static or dynamic build?
If the question is "am I allowed to distribute a binary based on (L)GPL software" then the answer does not depend on static or dynamic linking. > Does it contain GPL components? > Does it contain non-free components? > There are cases where you can share a dynamic build (no GPL parts) that > links to non-free libraries but not a static build. (I think building with > BMD Decklink support is in that catagory.) No. Decklink is not GPL-compatible. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
