It is not my intention to do top posting, this is because I do not like to use mail apps, I like the graphical interface web, and this does not have options to avoid it
De: Carl Zwanzig Enviado: lunes, 26 de octubre de 2020 6:44 Para: [email protected] Asunto: Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) On 10/25/2020 10:14 PM, Juan carlos Rebate wrote: > However if you compile two separate versions > there would be no licensing issue if you share it, would it? If you "share" the build, then technically you're distributing it. The one that's GPL only is perfectly fine to share (following the rules of the GPL, please read them....), but if non-free parts are statically linked in, then I don't think that one is distributable. The questions that drive "can I distribute" include- Is this a static or dynamic build? Does it contain GPL components? Does it contain non-free components? There are cases where you can share a dynamic build (no GPL parts) that links to non-free libraries but not a static build. (I think building with BMD Decklink support is in that catagory.) (Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a simple matrix to cover this. Maybe I'll write one up sometime.) A big question is whether you need --enable-gpl or not. Please don't top-post on this list. z! Oh, ya, I Am Not A Lawyer _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
