2018-10-31 19:34 GMT+01:00, Peter B. <p...@das-werkstatt.com>: > The relevant SMPTE standards committee made a revision, published in > 2014. Members of the committee–and this is perfectly normal–included > stakeholders from companies that had already invested in one or another > wrapping method. Thus the final 2014 version of ST 422 features three > options for interlaced wrapping (and two for progressive): > • “I1” Interlaced Frame Wrapping, 1 field per KLV Element (details > spelled out in section 5.4 in the standard) > • “I2” Interlaced Frame Wrapping, 2 fields per KLV Element (spelled out > in 5.5) > • “F1” Field Wrapping, 1 field per KLV Element (spelled out in 5.6) > [quote] > > Sorry for bugging anyone with J2K/MXF, but now I'm curious: > Is any of these 3 methods (currently) possible with ffmpeg?
The second solution can hopefully be implemented once the technical details are provided. The other solutions will need user-interaction (filters) if they get implemented so this is less likely. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
