Am 04.02.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Roman:
When you read reviews (academical, amateur, professional), there are no quotes and below-postings. Review author just mentions what exactly hes referring to and continues his review. And same goes to review on review. Please see academical reviews as an example. Yes, I've wrote 2 diplomas and lots of reviews, so I really know, what I'm saying :).
a review *is not* a living communication with follow-up replies from different people
If an academical approach is wrong for top-posting haters
it's a thread and not a academical reviewi don't need the full thread with many KB size in a ton of postings because i have the other ones and in case of a complex problem at the end of the thread only the open part remians in the quotes
it's also not a business communication where it makes sometimes sense take the last mail containing the *whole* communication, print it out and throw it into someones face
then I have nothing to say. Will have to get used to every mailing list approach (still there are many lists, where people do write with top posting, as it is human-like approach of socializing using e-mails
well, and on most mailing-lists ignorant top-posting with a full quote is not welcome, just because people don't handle it correct all day long make them not right
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tofu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
