Moritz Barsnick wrote:
Did you originally write "the console does not display errors"????

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 23:56:09 +0100, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
[h264 @ 0000000006290940] Found reference and non-reference fields
in the same frame, which is not implemented. Update your FFmpeg
version to the newest one from Git. If the problem still occurs, it
means that your file has a feature which has not been implemented.
[h264 @ 0000000006290940] If you want to help, upload a sample of
this file to ftp://upload.ffmpeg.org/incoming/ and contact the
ffmpeg-devel mailing list. ([email protected])

Unless someone disagrees, this here is the description of your
problem.

Yea could be, though transport streams at the start/with packet loss do
spew a lot of noise. I can't be sure I've seen that massage exactly, but
have seen "upload sample"  many times on streams that are fundamentally
playable once they get going or have a loss free run.

If you want to capture this as a file, you probably have to do
something like:

$ ffmpeg -i rtp://239.0.0.73:8208 -map 0:v -c copy -t 10 dump.ts

This has got me wondering - is it possible with ffmpeg to dump "raw"
without remuxing. I don't know if it would work with rtp but maybe

mplayer -dumpstream

would make a better sample as the original transport stream continuity
counters/PCRs would be intact and would show up any packet loss.

Is wireless involved here?

udpxy was mentioned, I tried that many years ago and it was useless in my test - maybe it's better now.

(Even more valuable information was at the top of your output,
probably scrolled out of screen?)

It would be good to see the start = stop the player quickly.

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

Reply via email to