On 15 Sep 2015, at 00:34, Andy Furniss <[email protected]> wrote: > Henk D. Schoneveld wrote: >> >> On 12 Sep 2015, at 22:16, Andy Furniss <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Henk D. Schoneveld wrote: >>>> First tried to upload to incoming but ii’s presented to me as RO >>>> >>>> Uploaded a 20MB file for someone interested in investigating at: >>>> http://we.tl/CpG3aaamaO >>> >>> It does seem to decode slower than other similar bitrate TV samples >>> I have. > >> Would this suggest that load when playing of such a file is higher >> then ‘normal behaving’ files ? > > I don't know about that - there seems to be spare, but then I don't > really trust top. > > The sample is quite short, so could be misleading, but looking at the > fps counter doing - > > ffmpeg -i infile -an -sn -f null - > > I get around 89 for your sample but 134 for the first bit of a similar > bitrate dvb sample I have. That’s about the same relative performance 89/134 as I’m seeing during encoding between the different kind of source files. > >> Or write-speed of decoded output to SSD or memory would be >> limited/lower then ‘normal behaving’ files ? > > I guess so if it decodes slower. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
