> 0- >>> The objective is to get lossless audio and video >> >> Just to make sure: Do you mean video and >> lossless audio? > Yes of course. This was a short way (in a wrong order indeed) to say > "...to get and keep the best Dazzle can provide without adding artefacts". > > 1- I read the video stream with -pix_fmt yuyv422 then write with > -pix_fmt yuv422p. No choice, as you wrote, > “As said, you cannot use PIX_FMT_YUYV422 because no encoder supports it.” > I think there is no lost but only a different way to organise. Do you agree? > > 2- There are clipping and drops (Highlighted by ++++++++++++++++++++). I > don't know why. Could you help? > > 3- With libx264 are there some options I could add to improve the > quality? (libx264 has a lot of options hard for me to understand) > _______________________________________________
@Carl In another thread you wrote: >> I.e. either use a codec designed for lossless encoding >> such as "HuffYUV", or use something like x264 with >> "lossless" settings. > FFv1 should be superior in (nearly) every regard, for > example you would need several different x264 libraries > to support all possible colour spaces and they are not > supported by Huffyuv at all. > > Carl Eugen I am confused. What should be the best codec for my usage: FFV1, x264, Huffyuv, other? Could you tell me the good options for this codec? JP _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
