On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:28:51PM +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> BTW, the major (SD) channels also get much more overall bandwidth than
> the minor ones, resulting in very sharp video quality (or rather quite
> sucky video quality on the latter channels). I don't know exact
> numbers, but I believe there may be more than a 2x factor. Audio is
> probably still said drop in the ocean.

Ah, this piece of info was missing before and that is the video is SD, not
HD.  It isn't weird to have only AC3 2.0 for SD channels.  I was thinking
in the world of HD.  Silly me.

MB
-- 
e-mail: vid...@vidiot.com | vid...@vidiot.net            /~\ The ASCII
        6082066...@email.uscc.net (140 char limit)       \ / Ribbon Campaign
Visit - URL: http://vidiot.com/                           X  Against
             http://vidiot.net/                          / \ HTML Email
"What do you say Beckett. Wanna have a baby?" - Castle to Det. Beckett
"How long have I been gone?" Alexis after seeing Castle and Beckett w/ baby
 - Castle - 11/25/13
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

Reply via email to