On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:16:16PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > lance.lmw...@gmail.com (12020-04-09): > > From: Limin Wang <lance.lmw...@gmail.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Limin Wang <lance.lmw...@gmail.com> > > --- > > doc/filters.texi | 3 +++ > > libavfilter/af_loudnorm.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > NACK. > > If we are doing something like that, we should be doing it in a way that > works for all filters that output statistics, not just one: common > options name and syntax, common code. > > Doing it that way will only result in similar filters having different > features in a way that no user can understand. > > Same for the compact output.
My patch set try to make the loudnorm filter easy to use for end user if they want to process the volume in two pass. I have no clue how to make it common yet. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George -- Thanks, Limin Wang _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
