On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 12:28:43PM +0200, FRÉDÉRIC RECOULES wrote: > Thank you for your answers. > > As you have pointed out, these patches are full of unrelated changes that are > not important for safety. > Most of them were never intended to be posted here, the diff we submitted was > the one of an > experimental branch and we apologize to have made such a mistake. > We will resubmit the patch with only essential patches in a more appropriate > format very soon > (git format-patch). > > @Michael These errors come with the Clang compiler, aren't they?
yes, seems this was clang version 4.0.0 (trunk 283753) i can retest and find a mininal command line for configure which triggers this in case you cannot reproduce it ? > We are aware that support for inline assembly may differ from one compiler to > another > despite the "higly-compatibility" that is stated. The safety patches we are > proposing > do not rely on them. > > @Carl @Kieran So far, we passed the FATE tests. > The output is slightly different because we have merged contiguous assembly > statement > such that the compiler can no longer insert instruction between them, but the > differences > are only instruction swaps A.B.C -> B.A.C. [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB There will always be a question for which you do not know the correct answer.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
