Am Mi., 4. März 2020 um 17:29 Uhr schrieb Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se>: > > ons 2020-03-04 klockan 11:31 +0100 skrev Carl Eugen Hoyos: > > Am Di., 3. März 2020 um 02:18 Uhr schrieb Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu>: > > > > > 2) support all frame rates and write 0 (undefined) as the package rate > > > for frame rates which cannot be exactly represented > > > > Why not? > > > > Allow me to repeat: Professional archivists recommend using mxf. How > > do they store digitized content from (old) low-fps film? > > We can worry about that when archivists open tickets on trac.
A ticket was actually opened asking for more frame rates (just as a ticket was opened earlier because of a limitation in aspect ratios), I wonder why mxf is the only (?) libavformat muxer that tells the user which frame rates (in the past: which aspect ratios) to use. It is very hard to believe that the reason is that mxf does not allow other frame rates (I have to listen once a year to a presentation explaining how versatile mxf is compared to all other multimedia containers). Just print a warning when you feel that the chosen framerate will not ensure maximum compatibility. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
