On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:20:56PM -0800, Dale Curtis wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:23:07AM -0800, Dale Curtis wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:23 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > so i think it works but maybe ive missed something, for which values
> > > > of e2_pts do you see a problem with e1_pts = INT64_MIN?
> > > >
> > >
> > > For e1_pts = INT64_MIN and e2_pts >= 0 you end up with a negative int64_t
> > > result for e2_pts - (uint64_t)e1_pts, so it's always < time_tolerance. If
> > > that's what you intended, then sgtm.
> >
> > thats what the code would do if the elemnts where large enough to not
> > overflow
> > so that seems to match whats intended.
> >
> > Do you see some issue here ?
> >
> 
> Whoops, sorry, I just realized my previous comment was rejected from the
> list since I used the wrong e-mail address. My previous statement was
> incorrect. The code you proposed correctly promotes a uint64_t and not an
> int64_t when used in a conditional. Here's what I wrote that got lost:
> "Actually, this was a test construction error on my part. In a conditional
> this does evaluate to a uint64_t vs int64_t, so the comparison is valid.
> I've attached your recommended patch. Thanks for your patience."
> 
> - dale
>  utils.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 1a4608774ffd8058ff9e6f62845c51c91ccd84e0  ubfix_v2.patch
> From c50d0a347fc779c71c07757d9cad8a7d56eb857b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dale Curtis <dalecur...@chromium.org>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 16:49:14 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix undefined behavior in ff_configure_buffers_for_index()
> 
> When e2_pts == INT64_MIN and e1_pts >= 0 the calculation of
> e2_pts - e1_pts will overflow an int64_t.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dale Curtis <dalecur...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  libavformat/utils.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

will apply

thanks

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Take away the freedom of one citizen and you will be jailed, take away
the freedom of all citizens and you will be congratulated by your peers
in Parliament.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to