Am Di., 17. Dez. 2019 um 19:36 Uhr schrieb Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org>: > > Carl Eugen Hoyos (12019-12-16): > > From f164e22f185d6a3e69d3376246a41a6958dba215 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> > > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:02:19 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH] lavu/log: Do not print pointer addresses for loglevel < > > debug. > > > > --- > > libavutil/log.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > It could make sense, but I think not exactly like that. > > Right now, at loglevel info, we have: > > [something @ 0x42] Info > > And at loglevel debug, we have: > > [something @ 0x42] Info > [something @ 0x42] Debug > > With your change, that would become respectively: > > (i) [something Info > > (d) [something] Info > (d) [something @ 0x42] Debug > > It think it would be better to have: > > (i) [something] Info > > (d) [something @ 0x42] Info > (d) [something @ 0x42] Debug > > In practice, it means testing av_log_level rather than level to > determine whether the address should be printed.
Of course. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
