On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:48 PM Timo Rothenpieler <t...@rothenpieler.org> wrote: > > On 20/11/2019 11:29, Oleg Dobkin wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 23:58 +0100, Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > >> Only thing I'm still wondering is if it would make sense to use the > >> primary context by default. > >> I can't think of any obvious downsides, other than weakened > >> isolation, > >> which really shouldn't be a huge concern. > >> And there apparently are some potential performance gains. > > > > I think it's safer to leave the default behavior, in case of some > > unknown corner cases - there could be some legacy code that assumes the > > creation of different contexts per each decoder. > > > > Good point. I haven't found the time to give this a test run so far. > Once I did, and nothing exploded, I'll do a round of releases of > ffnvcodec and apply the patch.
Is there any progress on this? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
