Please, ignore this patch.

On 2019-10-18 01:44, James Almer wrote:
On 10/17/2019 7:34 PM, Andrey Semashev wrote:
Actually reorder the values.

Should effectively fix ticket #8300.

Not sure why you decided to send a modified patch by another dev, and
with the author name changed, but that's not ok.

---
  libavcodec/libdav1d.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libavcodec/libdav1d.c b/libavcodec/libdav1d.c
index 8aa248e6cd..774e741db8 100644
--- a/libavcodec/libdav1d.c
+++ b/libavcodec/libdav1d.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
  #include "libavutil/mastering_display_metadata.h"
  #include "libavutil/imgutils.h"
  #include "libavutil/opt.h"
+#include "libavutil/mem.h"
#include "avcodec.h"
  #include "decode.h"
@@ -164,6 +165,10 @@ static void libdav1d_data_free(const uint8_t *data, void 
*opaque) {
      av_buffer_unref(&buf);
  }
+static void libdav1d_user_data_free(const uint8_t *data, void *opaque) {
+    av_free(data);

This will generate a warning about dropped const qualifier.

+}
+
  static int libdav1d_receive_frame(AVCodecContext *c, AVFrame *frame)
  {
      Libdav1dContext *dav1d = c->priv_data;
@@ -179,6 +184,8 @@ static int libdav1d_receive_frame(AVCodecContext *c, 
AVFrame *frame)
              return res;
if (pkt.size) {
+            int64_t *reordered_opaque;
+
              res = dav1d_data_wrap(data, pkt.data, pkt.size, 
libdav1d_data_free, pkt.buf);
              if (res < 0) {
                  av_packet_unref(&pkt);
@@ -191,6 +198,22 @@ static int libdav1d_receive_frame(AVCodecContext *c, 
AVFrame *frame)
pkt.buf = NULL;
              av_packet_unref(&pkt);
+
+            reordered_opaque = av_malloc(sizeof(int64_t));
+
+            if (!reordered_opaque) {
+                dav1d_data_unref(data);
+                return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
+            }
+
+            *reordered_opaque = c->reordered_opaque;
+            res = dav1d_data_wrap_user_data(data, (const uint8_t 
*)reordered_opaque,
+                                            libdav1d_user_data_free, NULL);
+            if (res < 0) {
+                av_free(reordered_opaque);
+                dav1d_data_unref(data);
+                return res;
+            }

As i said, i don't want this done unconditionally. It's not going to be
used in 99% of cases.

          }
      }
@@ -260,7 +283,8 @@ static int libdav1d_receive_frame(AVCodecContext *c, AVFrame *frame)
      else
          frame->format = c->pix_fmt = pix_fmt[p->p.layout][p->seq_hdr->hbd];
- frame->reordered_opaque = c->reordered_opaque;
+    if (p->m.user_data.data)
+        frame->reordered_opaque = *(int64_t *)p->m.user_data.data;
// match timestamps and packet size
      frame->pts = frame->best_effort_timestamp = p->m.timestamp;


_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".


_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to