On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 2:47 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Mo., 9. Sept. 2019 um 22:19 Uhr schrieb Aman Gupta <ffm...@tmm1.net>: > > > > From: Aman Gupta <a...@tmm1.net> > > > > These are simple algorithms which can be run efficiently > > on low powered devices to produce deinteraced images. > > Please provide some numbers about the performance > (and subjective visual quality) of the new C code in > comparison to existing deinterlacers in FFmpeg. > Comparison of visual quality can be seen on VLC's website: https://wiki.videolan.org/Deinterlacing Regarding performance- none of the filters currently available in ffmpeg are fast enough to deinterlace video in real time on ARM chips used by popular Android or iOS devices. They're all very computationally expensive, and do not have any ARM SIMD implementations. The deinterlacers from VLC use simple mathematical averages optimized by SIMD, and have been used by VLC on such devices for many years. I don't have any hard numbers to share, but in my experience I can decode+deinterlace video for real time playback in VLC on any cheap Android phone, whereas other ffmpeg-based players cannot. Aman > Carl Eugen > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
