Michael, On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 6:21 PM Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:11:50PM +0200, Pascal Massimino wrote: > > Michael, > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:20 PM Michael Niedermayer > <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 07:43:15AM +0200, Pascal Massimino wrote: > [...] > > > > > > > i would guess its not a known chunk but rather hits the default > > > is that just a bunch of 0 or 0xFF bytes ? > > > detecting before we read into the end feels more robust if > > > we can simply detect the "junk" > > > > > > > As i mentioned in the description, a possibly more robust solution would > be > > just stopping the loop as soon as 'chunk_size' bytes have been consumed > > (leading to *got_frame = 1) and no more. This current patch is > minimalist, > > though. > > well, which solution do you prefer ? > the one in the patch is fine. skal/ > > thx > > [...] > > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the > dead. -- Aristotle > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
