On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:18:09PM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 18:06, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 05:09:51PM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 14:16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Am Di., 20. Aug. 2019 um 14:48 Uhr schrieb Paul B Mahol < > > one...@gmail.com [...] > > > > > But what is more bizare (to me at least) is that this was not a controversy > > at the time CFR was the standard and all these codecs where "new". > > Please correct me if iam wrong but the "CFR must be CFR" seems to > > originate > > from some professional broadcast people (like you). > > > > This is what you would call an "ad-hominem"
I was in fact unsure what term to use when writing this but I belived that "professional broadcast people" would be considered a polite term. Apparently not and in that sense really no term i could have used would have worked. I mean anything thats in the dictionary would have been seen this way probably, if this was ... I just tried to explain the situation and the source of the viewpoints from how i remembered it but its hard when theres no word that one can use ... or when iam to dumb to find that word ... Sorry but that really was not meant as an insult [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Avoid a single point of failure, be that a person or equipment.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
