On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 08:49:06AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > On 18.08.2019, at 01:28, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > 30M cycles -> 5M cycles > > I see nothing wrong with it, but: > You could save reviewers a lot of time if you gave them a hint of what the > change > contains instead of them having to reverse-engineer. > In this case for example something like > "add inner loop specialisations for 2 bpp and 4 bpp"
added > > > > > @@ -1363,19 +1364,38 @@ exit_loop: > > unsigned x, y; > > > > av_assert0(s->bit_depth > 1); > > - > > Cosmetic? removed and reposted thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB When you are offended at any man's fault, turn to yourself and study your own failings. Then you will forget your anger. -- Epictetus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
