On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:23:09PM +0800, Shiyou Yin wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org 
> >[mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of
> >Michael Niedermayer
> >Sent: Friday, August 9, 2019 12:07 AM
> >To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> >Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] avutil/mips: refine msa macros CLIP_*.
> >
> >On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:49:35AM +0800, 顾希伟 wrote:
> >> > 发件人: "Michael Niedermayer" <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> >> > 发送时间: 2019-08-08 07:05:13 (星期四)
> >> > 收件人: "FFmpeg development discussions and patches"
> >> > <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
> >> > 抄送:
> >> > 主题: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] avutil/mips: refine msa macros CLIP_*.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:52:00PM +0800, gxw wrote:
> >> > > Changing details as following:
> >> > > 1. Remove the local variable 'out_m' in 'CLIP_SH' and store the result 
> >> > > in
> >> > >    source vector.
> >> > > 2. Refine the implementation of macro 'CLIP_SH_0_255' and 
> >> > > 'CLIP_SW_0_255'.
> >> > >    Performance of VP8 decoding has speed up about 1.1%(from 7.03x to 
> >> > > 7.11x).
> >> > >    Performance of H264 decoding has speed up about 0.5%(from 4.35x to 
> >> > > 4.37x).
> >> > >    Performance of Theora decoding has speed up about 0.7%(from 5.79x 
> >> > > to 5.83x).
> >> > > 3. Remove redundant macro 'CLIP_SH/Wn_0_255_MAX_SATU' and use 
> >> > > 'CLIP_SH/Wn_0_255'
> >> > >    instead, because there are no difference in the effect of this two 
> >> > > macros.
> >> >
> >> > can these 3 things be split into 3 patches ?
> >> > It would be clearer if each change would be in its own patch
> >> >
> >> > thanks
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >>
> >> It can be split into 3 patches. But there some benefits as 1 patch, these 
> >> macros belong to the same
> >>class and are highly relevant. It is more intuitive to put them in a patch.
> >
> >hmm
> >does anyone else has any oppinion about this ?
> >
> >if not ill apply it
> >
> 
> In fact, change 2 and 3 is related closely. it's using a new macro to replace 
> 'CLIP_SH/Wn_0_255' and
>  'CLIP_SH/Wn_0_255_MAX_SATU'. So, It's better to put 2&3 in one patch. 
> Change 1 belongs to the same macro type of change 2&3. Putting it together is 
> mainly because of there are
> too many macros are pending refactor, It's a balance between patch complexity 
> and patch number.
> So it's acceptable to me. 

ok, will apply

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Whats the most studid thing your enemy could do ? Blow himself up
Whats the most studid thing you could do ? Give up your rights and
freedom because your enemy blew himself up.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to