On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 08:30:51PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > On 08.08.2019, at 10:36, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > This provides an alternative to retry counters. > > Useful if there is no reasonable maximum number of iterations and > > no ordering that naturally avoids loops. > > Going by the old principle of "an API is not tested until it has at least 3 > users" > might it make sense to delay this until we've found and tested it in a few > use-cases? > Depending on how much hurry there is to get the bug-fix in.
> I assume there is also an actual bug-fix patch somewhere, maybe we should > have that > in the same patch series to make it easier to review the actual usage? sure will repost this eventually with 3+ bugfixes. But wont search for such bugs ATM as ive too many other things to do so it might take a bit of time before i do > > > diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges > > index 6603a8229e..eee4c30ec5 100644 > > --- a/doc/APIchanges > > +++ b/doc/APIchanges > > @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ libavutil: 2017-10-21 > > > > API changes, most recent first: > > > > +2019-XX-XX - XXXXXXXXXX - lavu 56.XX.XXX - loop_detector.h > > + Add loop_detector.h, av_is_loop(), AVSimpleLoopDetector > > Does is mean it is a public/installed header? that was intended, but it can of course be trivially be kept local if people prefer when i repost with 3+ dependant fixes > I'd prefer to keep new APIs internal until they are really proven in use if > there is no immediate pressure. [...] thx -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
