> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf > Of James Almer > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 10:19 PM > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] lavc/qsvdec: Add VP9 decoder > support > > On 6/26/2019 3:00 AM, Li, Zhong wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On > Behalf > >> Of Li, Zhong > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 10:32 AM > >> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > >> <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > >> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] lavc/qsvdec: Add VP9 > >> decoder support > >> > >>> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On > >> Behalf > >>> Of Mark Thompson > >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:40 AM > >>> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > >>> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] lavc/qsvdec: Add VP9 decoder > >>> support > >>> > >>> From: Zhong Li <zhong...@intel.com> > >>> > >>> VP9 decoder is supported on Intel kabyLake+ platforms with MSDK > >>> Version 1.19+ > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Zhong Li <zhong...@intel.com> > >>> --- > >>> On 20/03/2019 14:41, Li, Zhong wrote: > >>>> Yes, QSV is a marketing name which is no equal to libmfx/MSDK. > >>>> But would be better to keep consistent with others, such as "Intel > >>> QSV-accelerated VP8 video decoding" in pervious changelog? > >>> > >>> I don't think so? VP9 decoding with the QSV hardware is already > >>> supported, this only adds the additional option of using libmfx to > >>> access the same thing as well. > >> > >> Ok, here are just some words description of changelog. I will be > >> happy to see this patch can be applied. > >> (As previous comment, the updated version of vp9 parser with pic_type > >> of key frame issue fixing LGTM.) > > > > Ping? > > > > If nobody against, I will merge it with cbs vp9 parser patch during one > week. > > Please, don't push a patchset written by Mark without his approval. I > reviewed a few other patches from this set and he will most likely submit a > new version for all of them.
Thanks for your remind, James. Yes I saw your comment for av1, I thought the others should be ok but pending for a while. Anyway, will hold on and waiting for Mark's response. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
