On 25/05/2019 04:25, James Almer wrote: >> + > > Unnecessary empty line.
Fixed. > Could we not? The idea is to eventually kill these, so we should at > least try to not make them even more widespread... As far as I know, they can't be removed, as there isn't a simple replacement for some of their functionality. Has this changed? Either we finally act on their """deprecation""", or we at least have consistent behavior. e.g. libx264.c has almost this exact bit of code, and users would expect libx265.c to behave the same. As far as I'm concerned, until the YUVJ stuff is /actually/ behind deprecation guards, it's deprecated in name only... for years. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
