> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf > Of Jun Zhao > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 12:29 AM > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > Cc: Jun Zhao <barryjz...@tencent.com> > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V1] lavfi/lut: Add slice threading support > > From: Jun Zhao <barryjz...@tencent.com> > > Used the command for 1080p h264 clip as follow: > > a). ffmpeg -i input -vf lutyuv="u=128:v=128" -f null /dev/null > b). ffmpeg -i input -vf lutrgb="g=0:b=0" -f null /dev/null > > after enabled the slice threading, the fps change from: > > a). 144fps to 258fps (lutyuv) > b). 94fps to 153fps (lutrgb) > > in Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz > > Signed-off-by: Jun Zhao <barryjz...@tencent.com> > --- > libavfilter/vf_lut.c | 328 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > ------- > 1 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_lut.c b/libavfilter/vf_lut.c > index c815ddc..61550ee 100644 > --- a/libavfilter/vf_lut.c > +++ b/libavfilter/vf_lut.c > @@ -337,13 +337,194 @@ static int config_props(AVFilterLink *inlink) > return 0; > } > > +struct thread_data { > + AVFrame *in; > + AVFrame *out; > + > + int w; > + int h; > +};
I think it's better to refine the patch to avoid duplicating code, the exiting source code has been copy-pasted too much. Maybe we just need lut_packed() and lut_planar(). For 8/16 variation, I think it is easy to add one field( like "int is_16bit;")in thread_data to solve it. Ruiling > + > +/* packed, 16-bit */ > +static int lut_packed_16bits(AVFilterContext *ctx, void *arg, int jobnr, int _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
