On 5/19/19, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 19 May 2019, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
>> On 5/19/19, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote:
>>> Fixes infinte loop with -vf loop=loop=1.
>>>
>>> Possible regression since ef1aadffc785b48ed62c45d954289e754f43ef46.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu>
>>> ---
>>> libavfilter/f_loop.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/libavfilter/f_loop.c b/libavfilter/f_loop.c
>>> index d9d55f9837..3da753dd1e 100644
>>> --- a/libavfilter/f_loop.c
>>> +++ b/libavfilter/f_loop.c
>>> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static int activate(AVFilterContext *ctx)
>>>
>>> FF_FILTER_FORWARD_STATUS_BACK(outlink, inlink);
>>>
>>> - if (!s->eof && (s->nb_frames < s->size || !s->loop)) {
>>> + if (!s->eof && (s->nb_frames < s->size || !s->loop || !s->size)) {
>>> ret = ff_inlink_consume_frame(inlink, &frame);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> return ret;
>>> --
>>> 2.16.4
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>>> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
>>> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>>
>> I think better fix is to change default and minimal allowed loop size to
>> 1.
>> Does that sounds ok to you?
>
> Well, looping the whole length of the input would be more intuitive to me
> as the default.
That would require infinite memory.
>
> Regards,
> Marton
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
