Am So., 12. Mai 2019 um 22:37 Uhr schrieb Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: > > On 5/12/19, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Am Fr., 10. Mai 2019 um 17:15 Uhr schrieb Lynne <d...@lynne.ee>: > >> > >> Patch updated again. > >> Made some more cleanups to the transforms, the tables and the main > >> context. > >> API changed again, now the init function populates the function pointer > >> for transform. > >> I decided that having a separate function would encourage bad usage (e.g. > >> calling > >> the function every time before doing a transform rather than storing the > >> pointer) when > >> we're trying to avoid the overhead of function calls. > >> Also adjusted file names to match the API. > > > > As said, this patch is not ok as long as the copyright statements are > > missing. > > > > You are mislead. No statements are necessary.
Why do you think so? The commit message states that a part of the code is coming from a file with an extensive copyright statement: Why would it be ok to remove it? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
