On 5/12/19, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12019-05-12): >> Calling atempo filter atempo when it also modifies pitch is bad for users >> and >> at same time not having apitch filter, user would think that they can >> not alter pitch. >> Sorry if you can not understand my fears. > > As I have pointed to you (but you made a show of misunderstanding on > purpose), changing the pitch and changing the speed of an audio signal > are fundamentally the same thing, they are connected by the sample rate. > > In my experience, most people are aware of that, including completely > non-technical people: they know that if you speed up or down a sound, > its pitch changes. > > The documentation, of course, can be enhanced to make sure it contains > all keyword a user is likely to search. And if the options can be > tweaked to allow setting exactly the wanted output in the most > convenient way (like we have a setdar, even though only the SAR exists > in the library), it is even better.
We have both setsar and setdar, why should we not have both atempo and apitch? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
