On 5/4/19, John Warburton <j...@johnwarburton.net> wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 2:41 PM Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > >> Paul B Mahol (12019-05-04): >> > I open votes for 7 days. Voting is about inclusion of scaletempo >> > filter (IMHO it is better than atempo) in FFmpeg. >> > >> > Thanks for voting. >> >> Voting for what? This mail does not look remotely like the voting >> procedure. For starters, a vote must come after a discussion failed to >> reach a consensus. AFACS, this is the first time scaletempo is mentioned >> on this mailing list this year. >> > > An earlier post referring to scaletempo, from December 2017, suggested > replacement of atempo. Please may I note that at least one commercial radio > station, that I personally broadcast on daily, uses atempo for adjusting > the timing of news bulletins so they exactly fit a particular time. A > change in its operation, rather than the addition of a new filter, may > cause concern at least that one place. > > Is there a patch I can use to test scaletempo to compare it against atempo? > It'll be no trouble to do that with the normal audio that is time-adjusted > on that radio station. It may be that its increased quality is most > welcome, of course. > with best wishes, > JW
There is old patch on this ML (but it probably no more applies cleanly), and no, this is not about removing/replacing filter, this is about adding new filter. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
