On 4/28/2019 8:19 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
> On 17/04/2019 03:56, James Almer wrote:
>> These are more in line with the new ones introduced in the previous commit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> No more i() macro :p
>>
>> Figured I'd leave all the byte and checksum fields using the custom range
>> macro, to have the explicit hex values visible. That's why they were not
>> changed in the first patch.
>>
>>  libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c                |   8 +-
>>  libavcodec/cbs_h264_syntax_template.c |  52 ++++++-------
>>  libavcodec/cbs_h265_syntax_template.c | 106 +++++++++++++-------------
>>  3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c b/libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c
>> index 319202fc48..5623fa705e 100644
>> --- a/libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c
>> +++ b/libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c
>> @@ -250,21 +250,21 @@ static int cbs_write_se_golomb(CodedBitstreamContext 
>> *ctx, PutBitContext *pbc,
>>  
>>  #define SUBSCRIPTS(subs, ...) (subs > 0 ? ((int[subs + 1]){ subs, 
>> __VA_ARGS__ }) : NULL)
>>  
>> -#define u(width, name, range_min, range_max) \
>> +#define uc(width, name, range_min, range_max) \
>>          xu(width, name, current->name, range_min, range_max, 0)
>>  #define ub(width, name) \
>>          xu(width, name, current->name, 0, MAX_UINT_BITS(width), 0)
>>  #define flag(name) ub(1, name)
>>  #define ue(name, range_min, range_max) \
>>          xue(name, current->name, range_min, range_max, 0)
>> -#define i(width, name, range_min, range_max) \
>> +#define ic(width, name, range_min, range_max) \
>>          xi(width, name, current->name, range_min, range_max, 0)
>>  #define ib(width, name) \
>>          xi(width, name, current->name, MIN_INT_BITS(width), 
>> MAX_INT_BITS(width), 0)
>>  #define se(name, range_min, range_max) \
>>          xse(name, current->name, range_min, range_max, 0)
>>  
>> -#define us(width, name, range_min, range_max, subs, ...) \
>> +#define ucs(width, name, range_min, range_max, subs, ...) \
>>          xu(width, name, current->name, range_min, range_max, subs, 
>> __VA_ARGS__)
>>  #define ubs(width, name, subs, ...) \
>>          xu(width, name, current->name, 0, MAX_UINT_BITS(width), subs, 
>> __VA_ARGS__)
>> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int cbs_write_se_golomb(CodedBitstreamContext 
>> *ctx, PutBitContext *pbc,
>>          xu(1, name, current->name, 0, 1, subs, __VA_ARGS__)
>>  #define ues(name, range_min, range_max, subs, ...) \
>>          xue(name, current->name, range_min, range_max, subs, __VA_ARGS__)
>> -#define is(width, name, range_min, range_max, subs, ...) \
>> +#define ics(width, name, range_min, range_max, subs, ...) \
>>          xi(width, name, current->name, range_min, range_max, subs, 
>> __VA_ARGS__)
>>  #define ibs(width, name, subs, ...) \
>>          xi(width, name, current->name, MIN_INT_BITS(width), 
>> MAX_INT_BITS(width), subs, __VA_ARGS__)
> 
> Not sure I'm convinced by this one - the existing flag/u/ue/se set is really 
> very nice in matching the standard.  If anything, it makes me think of going 
> the other way in the AV1 code, though there are fewer limited values there so 
> the bare f() case is not so common.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Mark

I don't mind dropping this patch. You're right that as is it matches the
standard.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to