On 4/25/19, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Hendrik Leppkes (12019-04-25): >> The point of this kind of filtering is not that they are necessary to >> perform filtering, because you can filter at any sample rate, but that >> oversampling for certain filters, and downsampling after, improves >> quality. As such, negotiation is not really equipped to handle it, >> since its designed to deal with compatibility between filters, not >> quality concerns, and you also wouldn't want to remove the ability to >> filter at ordinary sample rates either. > > I do not want them to be available ONLY with negotiation. If people want > to add them, fine. > > But when negotiation decides a conversion needs to happen somewhere, > these treatments must be available for it, at the place where it is > needed, which is often not known to the user. > > And the simplest way of achieving that is to make it an option of the > resample filter, or even better, en option if lswr. After all, it is > only the audio equivalent of sws_flags=neighbor.
The filter does not take sample rate as argument, but integer factor instead. So that make it impossible to be used with lswr. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
