I apperciate the efforts to reply more than half a line. Paul B Mahol (12019-04-21): > It is not kind of resampling. Resampling is specific and belongs to > separate library.
There is no doubt it IS a kind of resampling: it is in the name. The question is whether is it specific enough to warrant a separate interface. > The oversampling is another thing, and doing only upsampling/downsampling > via libswresample is fragile/incomplete, as you need some kind of lowpass. > (be it IIR, FIR or simple FFT) after upsample and before downsample. There are various way of doing a resampling with various properties. This is just another one. > That is why it best fit into lavfi because it is just one block of > processing with multiple solutions. Making it a separate filter is the easy solution, but not the good one. It is reporting all the choices to later or the end user. That makes for easy quick code now, but terrible use later. > Also how that could be exported? It does not belong there. Options. We already have them, just add a few. And in that case, it becomes accessible for all filters. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
