2019-03-26 12:28 GMT+01:00, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net>: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:22:58 +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> > While trying to see if the proposed XV demuxer[1] can be simplified, I >> > tripped over the fact that this KUX patch introduces a new demuxer for >> > what looks like "only" a minor variant of FLV. Could the patch not just >> > as well extend the flv probe and the extension list? >> >> What would be the advantage? > > Not exploding the list of supported formats by many minor subvariants. > (It seems KUX is 99% FLV, with a different header tag and an offset.)
> I know it's a special example, but imagine "mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2" > implemented as six separate formats, six separate probes, ... Not sure how easy it would be to separate them via probe. Did you receive my private mail? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
