On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 23:02, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, at 20:52, Marton Balint wrote: > >> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > >> > >> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, at 19:34, Marton Balint wrote: > >> >> As I described in similar threads before, whether or not the project > want > >> >> closed source support for NDI is a subjective issue, please start a > vote > >> >> about the removal of libndi if you want to seek this through. > >> > > >> > The removal of libndi is actually done and committed. > >> > >> That is just sad an unfair. > > > > Sad, maybe. > > Unfair, I disagree. If NDI wants to be in, they know what to do. > > It is unfair towards the people who expressied disapproval, yet this > change was committed without neither vote nor consensus. > > Regards, > Marton > > > At the very best, the lack of consensus on this implies vindictive intent. Is there something that the FFmpeg developers (see below) have against Newtek, as a company? Clearly, they took down the offending FFmpeg build: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589?cversion=0&cnum_hist=10
We've seen other violations, such as this one by Amazon: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7214 that were handled in a much more graceful manner. The primary agitator here seems to be kierank: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589?cversion=0&cnum_hist=10#comment:5 What undisclosed history do you have with Newtek (see the reference to "Andrew") above that isn't disclosed above? Secondly, you're quite influential in the broadcast industry: https://www.obe.tv/author/obe/ There's an aura of hostility around this commit, and whatever that is seems to have spilled over into this. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
