2019-03-12 0:25 GMT+01:00, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net>: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 23:23:15 +0100, Ulf Zibis wrote: >> >> I believe, it's faster because of: >> > Please post some numbers if your patch is supposed to >> > speed up the filter. >> >> Hm, I have no clue how to do this. I thing the listed arguments speak >> for themselves. Is there a kind of harness, template or framework for >> this? > > Well, belief is not enough. ;-) In the simplest case, you show command > lines of some examples using the filter (with various inputs, > parameters) and their filtering/encoding performance before and after > the patch.
> Ideally, you use the START_TIMER/STOP_TIMER macros to > profile the actual functions you changed. (Check this mailing list's > archives for some examples, and play with the code.) But this should not be needed if time (the command) and / or benchmark (the FFmpeg option) show clear improvements. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
