2019-03-08 20:10 GMT+01:00, Matthew McKenna <mmcke...@idsys.net>: > On 3/8/2019 1:36 PM, Tomas Härdin wrote: >> fre 2019-03-08 klockan 19:04 +0100 skrev Carl Eugen Hoyos: >>> 2019-03-08 14:20 GMT+01:00, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se>: >>> >>>> This adds some HEVC demux tests for mxfdec.c for the >>>> Canon XF705 samples provided by Matthew McKenna. >>>> I suspect the thing that's most valuable here is that the >>>> codec probing works correctly, which it seems to do. >>> This email is missing the additional size in the fate repo. >>> >>> I would prefer not to be the one arguing against an additional >>> test but afaict this is testing one line in a static array: Is that >>> really useful and does it justify a large additional file? >> >> That's a fair point. Maybe if they were a single frame each.. Matthew?
> > The "verysmall" clips are as small as I can make them -- 1.3 megabytes > -- 1 second of video + audio w/ bars+tone. As this is coming off the > camera there is not much editing capability, and the camera has a > minimum record duration. > > Would it suffice to test only a subset or sample of the clips? Allow me to repeat my question: Is this test meant to check a single entry in a static table? If this test is necessary, we should patch the mxf muxer to create a very low-res hevc mxf file that uses this uid. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
