On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 12:35:11PM +0800, Yukun Guo wrote: > On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 at 00:41, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > If the frame is copied, its copy would be at a different point in > > time so it may need a different poc and simply copying it might > > cause issues > > Sorry I didn't state it clearly. What I meant is POC = previous POC + > 2, not copied [1]. This is correct, since the frame is missing you > don't have better choices. I just wonder why not set field_poc? If I > add these two lines: > > h->short_ref[0]->field_poc[0] = prev->field_poc[0] + 2; > h->short_ref[0]->field_poc[1] = prev->field_poc[1] + 2;
setting field_poc to a "best effort" value should be better than not setting it, yes [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If you fake or manipulate statistics in a paper in physics you will never get a job again. If you fake or manipulate statistics in a paper in medicin you will get a job for life at the pharma industry.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
