James Almer (12019-01-13): > A temporal ban for first time offenders and such could maybe work. But > then we're back to the CoC discussion that went nowhere.
And look who blocked this... > And again, you think requesting the disclosure of the incentive behind > the patch will make a difference on the behavior of a person questioned > for ignoring reviews? So you think they would outright lie about their sponsorships? I am more optimistic: I believe there is a core of honesty and attachment to good code in most contributors, and that making them aware of their bias would be enough to convince them to try to do better, at least a start. But if you think they are actually dishonest and neglectful, then I concur with your conclusions: they have no business having commit rights. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
