> 在 2018年12月20日,上午12:19,Aleksey Skripka <ca...@undev.ru> 写道:
> 
> All my tests ok.
> Thank you, Adrian.
> 
>> On 19 Dec 2018, at 12:41, Adrian <adrian-...@o2.pl> wrote:
>> 
>> Okay, so given you two have some valid points, I've combined both and ended 
>> up with final version of the patch:
>> - it uses temp file for playlist when either a flag is specified or playlist 
>> type is anything other than VOD
>> - it does not use temp file for HLS_SINGLE_FILE in place mentioned by Aleksey
>> 
>> This is my final submission, I believe now everyone should be happy with the 
>> solution.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Adrian Guzowski
>> 
>> W dniu 18.12.2018 o 04:24, Ronak pisze:
>>>> On Dec 17, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Aleksey Skripka <ca...@undev.ru> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Evening!
>>>> 
>>>> First of all, about playlist writeout:
>>>> before 223d2bde22ce33dcbcb6f17f234b609cb98f1fb6 - playlist was always(!) 
>>>> creating via .tmp file.
>>>> after 223d2bde22ce33dcbcb6f17f234b609cb98f1fb6 - playlists .tmp logic 
>>>> become dependent on +temp_file flag.
>>>> 
>>>> I suggest to return to original logic.
>>>> Non-atomic playlist writeout - is a disaster to just any hls player. This 
>>>> way we will force everyone (except offline VOD) to start using +temp_file. 
>>>> Always!
>>>> Also, if somebody relying on this - they will get broken streams just 
>>>> after upgrade (It seems to me, that it can be a lot).
>>>> 
>>>> So, here maintainer should decide how to be.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> and about single_file:
>>>> if it will be decided to stay with current way (playlist's .tmp logic 
>>>> controlled by +temp_file flag), you are right - temp_file+single_file case 
>>>> become unreal.
>>>> if it will be decided to return original behaviour (playlist always via 
>>>> .tmp), someone can choose how to writeout media file (despite i understand 
>>>> temp+single is very-very rare case).
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> -- 
>>>> Aleksey Skripk
>>>> 
>>> Hey Aleksey,
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure the best thing to do here is to switch to the original logic. 
>>> The temp file is only necessary if you are doing LIVE or EVENT streams; it 
>>> has nothing to do with VOD; where streams are pre-generated. I don't see 
>>> why you would ever want tmp files there.
>>> Before this commit; ffmpeg used to take more than a week to fragment a 2.2 
>>> GB Audio File in VOD mode. With this change; it takes less than 1 minute. 
>>> Other competing tools take less than 1 minute.
>>> 
>>> Also, if you want temp files, you should be supplying the temp_file option 
>>> - the documentation clearly says that: 
>>> https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html#hls-2. If you do not want temp 
>>> files; then you should leave this option out. If you are forcing folks to 
>>> always accept the temp file, then why have an option? You should delete the 
>>> option and do it based on the playlist type.
>>> 
>>> Ronak
>>> 
>>>>> On 17 Dec 2018, at 19:12, Adrian <adrian-...@o2.pl 
>>>>> <mailto:adrian-...@o2.pl>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Comments inline.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Adrian Guzowski
>>>>> 
>>>>> W dniu 17.12.2018 o 16:56, Aleksey Skripka pisze:
>>>>>>> On 17 Dec 2018, at 18:45, Adrian <adrian-...@o2.pl 
>>>>>>> <mailto:adrian-...@o2.pl> <mailto:adrian-...@o2.pl 
>>>>>>> <mailto:adrian-...@o2.pl>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> IMO temp_file+single_file should be mutually exclusive - why would you 
>>>>>>> want to have temp file when you're using only one file anyway? In this 
>>>>>>> mode you would either pool for file changes or just get updated 
>>>>>>> playlist with new byte range (and that one should be updated after 
>>>>>>> video file). I believe this restriction was already in place anyway, 
>>>>>>> because there already were checks for HLS_SINGLE_FILE not being set, 
>>>>>>> before doing actual rename, so this was just a simplification of those 
>>>>>>> conditions.
>>>>>> not me to decide, please ;)
>>>>>> if playlist will always be done via .tmp, we will have a choice.
>>>>> Could you clarify what choice you're talking about? And the purpose of 
>>>>> this choice - frankly you got me lost with this. Regardless, I feel we're 
>>>>> getting off topic.
>>>>>>> As for playlist file - I'm not sure I follow, I've changed only places 
>>>>>>> where temp files were already used, so I don't think I broke something 
>>>>>>> in that matter.
>>>>>> not you, it was introduced by 223d2bde22ce33dcbcb6f17f234b609cb98f1fb6
>>>>> Not quite, temp files were already a feature, this commit narrowed 
>>>>> conditions where they are used. If you're referring to change in 
>>>>> hls_window about not checking TEMP flag - that is unrelated to current 
>>>>> state (before commit introducing regression, check was ignoring TEMP 
>>>>> flag, after commit it does take it into account - probably should be 
>>>>> discussed with person responsible for original change as to why it was 
>>>>> changed that way, so that's out of scope of this patch. Issue at hand is 
>>>>> not using TEMP files at all and that is fixed by this patch.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From repeat+level+trace I believe I saw that playlist file actually was 
>>>>>>> using a temp file, so if that's the thing you are concerned about, it 
>>>>>>> seems like it's all good.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Adrian Guzowski
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> W dniu 17.12.2018 o 16:36, Aleksey Skripka pisze:
>>>>>>>> Greetings!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Adrian,
>>>>>>>> with your variant of patch in case of '-hls_flags 
>>>>>>>> +temp_file+single_file' no .tmp logic will be used.
>>>>>>>> not sure what is better, but all previous versions was doing so.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> and also, i'm still sure, that for backward compatibility with all 
>>>>>>>> previous versions, index.m3u8 should always be written via .tmp file.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ps:
>>>>>>>> i noticed this bug such way: i do not use +temp_file, but rely on 
>>>>>>>> atomic rename of index.m3u8.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 17 Dec 2018, at 17:23, Adrian <adrian-...@o2.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> after upgrading FFmpeg from 4.0 to 4.1 I noticed that temp files in 
>>>>>>>>> HLS muxed stopped working.
>>>>>>>>> It looks like a regression introduced by 
>>>>>>>>> 223d2bde22ce33dcbcb6f17f234b609cb98f1fb6. I've prepared a patch and 
>>>>>>>>> tested it cross-compiling for my project's target platform (ARM, 
>>>>>>>>> Buildroot) and it seems like everything is in order. I ran regression 
>>>>>>>>> tests and nothing seems to be broken.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Please review it and possibly include this patch.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Adrian Guzowski
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> <0001-Fix-usage-of-temp_file-flag-in-hls_flags-option.patch>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>>>>>>>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>>>>>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>>>>>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>>>>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>>>>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> 
>>>>> <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>>
>>>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel 
>>>>> <http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel> 
>>>>> <http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel 
>>>>> <http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>>>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
>>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel 
>>>> <http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>> <0001-Fix-usage-of-temp_file-flag-in-hls_flags-option-v3.patch>_______________________________________________

Pushed 

Thanks
Steven
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel



_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to